----------. 1944. "Deutsch und Welsch: Die Anf鋘ge des Volksbewusstseins in Westeuropa". (= Antrittvorlesungen der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universit鋞 Bonn am Rhein, Heft 27.) Bonn: Bonner Universit鋞s-Buchdruckerei.
----------. 1964. Zur Grundlegung der ganzheitlicher Sprachauffassung: Aufs鋞ze19251933. Ed. by Helmut Gipper. D黶seldorf: Schwann.
----------. 1967. Die Sprachgemeinschaft als Gegenstand sprachwissenschaftlicher Forschung. Cologne: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Whitney, William Dwight. 1867. Language and the Study of Language: Twelve lectures on the principles of linguistic science. New York: Charles Scribner & Co.
Wilbur, Terence H., ed. & introd. 1977. The Lautgesetz-Controversy: A documentation (18851886). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Woolard, Kathryn A. 1998. "Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry". Schieffelin et. al. 1998.3-47.
Endnotes
1
From Noam Chomsky, "Is Peace at Hand?", Zeta Magazine (January 1988), p.12. I wish to thank Suzanne Kemmer (Rice University, Houston, Tex.) for having dug up this `gem' following my paper there on 4 February 1999 dealing with the subject of ideology in linguistic historiography.
2
I do not quite know what to make of Vennemann's recent proposals concerning the Indo-Europeans (e.g., Vennemann 1998), and why he thinks that his `Atlantiker' from the northern tip of Africa who he believes migrated as far as Scandinavia should have been `Semiten'. Certainly, the Berbers are not usually counted among them.
3
Cf. Trautmann (1997) on how British orientalism reveals the mutual reinforcement of linguistics and race theory from Sir William Jones' Ninth Anniversary Discourse (1792) onward throughout the entire 19th century and beyond, just to dispel the idea that `Aryanism' was a typically continental European idea.
4
In fact there were altogether six recognized categories nordisch, westisch, ostisch, dinarisch, ostbaltisch anf f鋖isch (Hutton 1998:323n.2) how else could Hitler, Goering, or Goebbels themselves have satisfied the `nordic' characteristics of blondness, trimness, or able-bodiness unless all sorts of allowances were made in Nazi discourse?
5
Typically, these are all assertions; no evidence is supplied.
6
I single out Gamkrelidze instead of also naming the Russian Vja c eslav Vs. Ivanov as well as it seems that the latter did not engage in the debate of the homeland issue following the publication of Gamkrelidze & Ivanov (1984); later co-publications are usually translations from the Russian of earlier joint articles. Cf. Gamkrelidze (1987, 1990) for later contributions to the on-going discussion.
7
Not having had a soul-searching discussion with Prof. Gamkrelidze (whom I have known since we first met at the 1972 Bologna Congress of Linguists) about his possible motivation for locating the Indo-European homeland where he does, I cannot of course honestly attribute motives to him for doing so, but the coincidence is nevertheless striking.
8
Interestingly, Gamkrelidze & Ivanov leave out, for instance, the reconstructions for `hand mill' and `kernel' found in Buck (1949) and the other three dictionaries mentioned earlier (cf. Krell 1994:44) .
9
For the sake of economy, I have reduced the bibliography to the bare minimum; the missing references can all be found in Hutton (1998), Joseph (1999), or Koerner (2000).